Knowledge Base

[ Discussions | TOC | Search | Post | Reply ]


YpTUqrKOEZEmZYxd

Category: Tools
From: NY
Date: 9/21/2014
Time: 12:15:43 PM
Remote Name: 37.187.89.77

Comments

The National Gallery <a href=" http://www.justicanostrilhos.org/actos-45-mg-price ">generic pioglitazone</a> Unfazed by Kendall’s change in tone, Charlie insists that technical problems will continue to bedevil the program. “You can trace the plane’s troubles today back to the 2006–2007 time frame,” he explained. “The program was at a critical point and Lockheed needed to prove they could meet weight requirements.” That, he says, led to a series of risky design decisions. “I can tell you, there was nothing they wouldn’t do to get through those reviews. They cut corners. And so we are where we are.” While acknowledging that weight was a pressing issue, Lockheed Martin spokesman Michael Rein told me that design trade-offs in 2006 and 2007 were made in concert with, and with the blessing of, Pentagon officials. He strenuously denied the company cut corners or in any way compromised safety or its core values.


Last changed: 09/21/14