Knowledge Base

[ Discussions | TOC | Search | Post | Reply ]


klwIANBkuHtq

Category: Tools
From: NY
Date: 11/29/2014
Time: 8:42:19 AM
Remote Name: 62.210.152.50

Comments

I was born in Australia but grew up in England <a href=" http://www.afceco.org/purchase-spironolactone ">casks monotonous purchase spironolactone finally domestic</a> And when the Bush administration sought to go around FISA altogether and undertake warrantless surveillance in the early 2000s, some corporations began to get very nervous. One telecom company, U.S. West, even refused to comply, arguing that it needed legal immunity if it was going to cooperate. That was provided in an amended FISA law in 2008. Former Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who worked in the Carter White House when FISA was first enacted in 1978, describes the long process by which the original law grew more and more obsolete as information moved faster and was more dispersed in the age of terrorism. At the time she was rising to become ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee. “Back in the old days, Congress used to review FISA applications,” she says, but gigabytes of data flowing on servers made that almost impossible.


Last changed: 11/29/14