Group cohesion and shape are both group-level (i.e., network-level) concepts.
Group cohesion refers to the overall connectedness or knittedness of a network.
Shape measures indicate what kind of shape the network has, such as
core-periphery, clumpy, etc.
Leavitt, H.1951 Some effects of certain
communication patterns on group performance. [pdf]
S. 2003. The key player problem. [html]
2006. Identifying sets of key players in a network.
Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory. 12(1):
Borgatti, S.P. and Everett
, M.G. 1999. Models of Core/Periphery Structures. Social Networks 21:
Johnson, J.C. 2000.
Network evolution at the south pole. [doc]
- Borgatti, S.P. and DeJordy, R. 2007. Cohesion. On Centrality.
N. A core/periphery structure in a corporate budgeting process.
Connections 22(2): 1-29. [html]
- Bearman, Faris, & Moody, "Blocking
the Future" Social Science History 23:501-533
- Klovdahl, A. S. 1985. "Social Networks and the Spread of Infectious
Diseases: The AIDS Example." Social Science Medicine 21:1203-16
Theory and Method
- Chase, Ivan. "Social
process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative
perspective." American Sociological Review 45:905-924 [^pdf]
Gould, Rodger (2002). "The
Origins of Status Hierarchies: A formal Theory and Empirical Test"
American Journal of Sociology. 107:1143-1178
Markovsky, B., & Chaffee, M. (1995). Social
identification and solidarity: A reformulation.
Advances in Group Processes, 12, 249-270.
Markovsky, B.,& Lawler, E. J. (1994).A new theory of group solidarity. In B. Markovsky, K.
Heimer,&J. O’Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 11, pp.
113-137). Greenwich,CT: JAI.